The Influence of Testing Protocols on Microhardness Tests of Composite Resin with Different Viscosities
نویسنده
چکیده
This study tested two hypotheses. The first null hypothesis affirms that there is no statistical difference when composite resin is submitted to knoop or vickers microhardness using different testing protocols. The second hypothesis tested the possible influence of elastic modulus of composite resin in microhardness tests. Two nanohybrid composites were used with different viscosity behavior (Grandio and Grandio Flow). Samples (n=540) were made with 4 mm diameter and 2 mm high using a PTFE mould, stored for 24h at 37°C protected from light and randomly divided into 36 groups according to the resin viscosity (medium and low), microhardness methodology (vickers or knoop), load (50, 100 or 500g) and time (15, 30 or 45s). Two readings were made at the light exposed surface of each sample with Shimadzu HMV tester accomplishing 1.080 indentations. The vickers and knoop results were submitted to a three-way ANOVA with fixed factors the composite viscosity, load and time, and the post-hoc Tukey multiple comparison test at α=0.05. Significant differences were recorded (p<0.001) between the microhradness methodologies with two viscosities rejecting both hypotheses rejecting both null hypotheses. Among the vickers tested samples, the average recorded ranged from 164.94 (50g for 45s) to 210.33 (100g for 45s) for the medium viscosity composite and from 31.2 (100g for 30s) to 88 (500g for 45s) for a low viscosity resin. Knoop microhardness results ranged from 128.92 (500g for 45s) to 184.26 (100g for 15s) for medium viscosity composite and from 23.6 (100g for 15s) to 73.4 (500g for 30s) for flowable compositive. In a controlled in vitro experiment, the microhardness formulas mislead researchers to associate an improvement of diagonal measurements to higher load with a linear and proportional behavior. It is not recommended to clinicians compare both vickers and knoop microhardness results of composite materials without similar protocols applied in the research.
منابع مشابه
مقایسه سختی سطح چهار نوع کامپوزیت بعد از کاربرد دهانشویههای مختلف
Introduction: Plaque control by mechanical method is not sufficient and mouthrinses are highly recomended for patients. Some studies have shown that both of alcohol and alcohol free mouthrinses can reduce the microhardness of restorative materials. This study aimed to investigate the effect of three commercial mouthrinses on the microhardness of four different composite resin. Methods: 60 spec...
متن کاملThe Effect of Irradiation Distance on Microhardness of Resin Composites Cured with Different Light Curing Units
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the microhardness of five different resin composites at different irradiation distances (2 mm and 9 mm) by using three light curing units (quartz tungsten halogen, light emitting diodes and plasma arc). METHODS A total of 210 disc-shaped samples (2 mm height and 6 mm diameter) were prepared from different resin composites (Simile, Aelite Aesthet...
متن کاملمقایسه اثر رژیمهای سفیدکننده کاربامید پراکساید بر ریزسختی کامپوزیت Z250
Introduction: Bleaching products with oxidizing mechanism can exert side effects on the restorative materials existing in the oral cavity. Since bleaching agents are applied in different concentrations, the present study aimed to compare the effect of different bleaching regims of carbamide peroxide on microhardness of Z250 microhybride composite. Methods: In this in vitro study , 32 specime...
متن کاملRelative Microhardness and Flexural Strength of Different Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorative Materials
Aim: to find out if there is a significant difference in the curing efficiency at the claimed 4 mm depth and in the mechanical properties between the tested pasteform bulk fill resin composite materials. Materials and Methods: Three paste-consistency bulk-fill resin composites were used in this study (Filtek bulk fill3M; X-trafilVoco; and SonicFill bulk-fillKerr). For the microhardness testing,...
متن کاملMicrohardness assessment of different commercial brands of resin composites with different degrees of translucence.
Owing to improvements in its mechanical properties and to the availability of shade and translucence resources, resin composite has become one of the most widely used restorative materials in present day Dentistry. The aim of this study was to assess the relation between the surface hardness of seven different commercial brands of resin composites (Charisma, Fill Magic, Master Fill, Natural Loo...
متن کامل